Stack
Clay enriches and assembles data. Clean decides who to work, why now, and what to say, then runs the warm motion. They stack cleanly: Clay fills the table, Clean acts on it.
Book a demoSummary
The Clay + Clean stack pairs Clay's enrichment and data with Clean's warm, grounded outbound. See the division of labor and how data flows from Clay into selection.
Last updated June 15, 2026
The short answer
Clay and Clean are not competitors in this setup; they are layers. Clay is the enrichment and data engine: it finds, enriches, and assembles account and contact data from many sources. Clean is the judgment and warm-execution layer on top: it profiles each lead against your ICP, maps warm paths from your real relationship graph, ranks accounts S through C, and runs grounded outreach. Clay fills the table; Clean decides and acts.
Clay is your enrichment and data layer; Clean is your judgment and warm-execution layer. Clay finds and enriches accounts and contacts from many sources and assembles them into structured data. Clean takes that data, profiles each lead against your ICP, ranks accounts, and runs grounded outreach. One fills the table, the other acts on it.
Enriched records flow from Clay into Clean's selection step. Clean reads that data alongside your indexed company knowledge and your team's relationship graph, then profiles every lead against 75 buying signals across 8 categories and ranks accounts S through C. Clay improves the input quality; Clean turns it into a pursuit decision with the evidence behind each score.
Because they do different jobs. Clay is strong at sourcing and enriching data at the column level, which Clean is happy to consume. Clean adds the layer Clay does not: warm-path mapping from your real relationship graph, ICP-grounded ranking, and low-volume outreach written from your knowledge. Keep Clay for data; add Clean for the motion.
Clay handles enrichment, so your records arrive complete. Clean then decides who to work and why now, ranks accounts S to C with evidence, surfaces warm paths, and drafts grounded messages your team approves. The result is a clean handoff from data to decision to send, with judgment in the middle instead of a raw list pushed straight to a sequencer.
Division of labor: Clay and Clean
| Clay | Clean | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Enrichment and data assembly | Judgment plus grounded warm execution |
| Inputs | Many data sources and providers | Your knowledge, relationship graph, and enriched data |
| Account selection | Filters and waterfalls on data | Ranks S to C against your ICP with evidence |
| Relationships | Not its focus | Maps warm paths from your real graph |
| Outreach | Hands off to a sender | Drafts grounded, low-volume messages |
| Best at | Filling the table with clean data | Deciding who to work and what to say |
By the numbers
Clean profiles every lead against 75 buying signals across 8 categories for under a dollar, then ranks accounts S through C with the evidence behind each score.
No. Clay and Clean do different jobs and stack together. Clay is an enrichment and data tool that sources and assembles account and contact records from many providers. Clean is the judgment and warm-execution layer on top: it profiles leads against your ICP, maps warm paths from your relationship graph, ranks accounts S through C, and runs grounded outreach. Keep Clay for data and add Clean for the motion.
Enriched records from Clay feed Clean's selection step. Clean reads that data alongside your indexed company knowledge and your team's relationship graph, then profiles each lead against 75 buying signals across 8 categories and ranks accounts S through C with evidence. Clay raises the quality of the input, and Clean turns that input into a ranked pursuit decision and a grounded message.
No. Clean is not an enrichment tool, a scraper, or a contact database. It is the judgment layer that decides who to work, why now, and what to say, plus grounded execution. Clay enriches and assembles data; Clean consumes good data, profiles it against your ICP, maps warm relationship paths, and runs low-volume outreach. The two are complementary layers, not substitutes.
No. Clean works from your indexed company knowledge, your team's real relationship graph, and its own profiling against 75 buying signals across 8 categories. If you already run Clay, its enriched data flows into Clean's selection step and improves input quality. If you do not, Clean still profiles, ranks accounts S through C, and drafts grounded outreach without it.
Clean is in closed beta and onboards a few teams at a time, usually live within about a week. During onboarding, Clean indexes your company knowledge and maps your relationship graph. If you run Clay, your enriched records feed into Clean's selection step so the warm motion starts from data you already trust rather than from scratch.
It is for B2B SaaS teams that already use Clay for enrichment and want a warm, grounded motion on top of clean data. Clay keeps doing what it does well, sourcing and structuring records. Clean adds ICP-grounded ranking S through C, warm-path mapping from your real relationship graph, and low-volume outreach written from your knowledge, so good data becomes good decisions and sends.
Next
Clean